Skip to content
YXNzZXRzL3BhZ2VzL0RKSV8wOTY4LmpwZw==

Real Impact from Real Mills: How Leading Producers Transformed Operations with IOM

Every steel mill faces distinct challenges, whether launching greenfield operations, expanding capacity, ensuring compliance, or modernizing fragmented systems. Explore how IOM delivered measurable business impact across diverse scenarios. Download detailed case studies for technical depth and stakeholder insights.

Case Study

Big River Steel: Greenfield Launch with $3B Investment at Stake

Company Profile

3.5M tons annually | Arkansas, USA | Forbes-ranked "Cleanest & Fastest-Growing Steelmaker in America" | LEED-certified facility

Business Challenge

In 2014, Big River Steel broke ground on a greenfield mill built on what was literally a cornfield. The physical infrastructure—coils, equipment, Level 0–3 systems—was being built by world-class equipment manufacturers. But there was a critical gap: no one was providing a Level 4 order management system.

That omission was catastrophic. Without a functioning Level 4:
  • No ability to accept customer orders
  • No production scheduling capability
  • No inventory tracking
  • No financial close
  • 1,700+ employees would be idle
  • $3B+ in equipment would generate zero ROI
  • An unmovable launch deadline with global stakeholders watching

Decision-Making Framework

Big River evaluated SAP and Oracle. Both vendors promised feasibility but struggled to articulate steel-specific solutions. The timeline (2+ years minimum) conflicted with the mill's launch date. The cost ($50M–$100M+) seemed disproportionate for order management alone.

"We had some familiarity with Shift's team from previous interactions. We liked the product they'd delivered. What stood out was that they grew up in steel. They understand the language, the process, the terminology. Generic consultants don't."
Mark OrvisDirector of Quality Assurance and Technical Service, Big River Steel

The 18-Month Build - Collaborative Deep-Dive

Month 1: Deep Analysis & Scoping
  • Comprehensive audit of BRS's operational requirements
  • Definition of process workflows (how orders flow from customer → production → fulfillment)
  • Wireframe design and UX validation with BRS teams
  • Technical architecture finalized (C#.Net, SQL Server, integration points)

Months 1–18: Iterative Development

  • Modular build sequence:
    • Phase 1: Customer module (contacts, credit terms, ship-to addresses)
    • Phase 2: Product/coil specification (dimensions, strength, grade)
    • Phase 3: Metallurgical specs and compliance rules
  • Weekly iterations with BRS operations teams
  • Real-time feedback incorporation
  • Shift team embedded in BRS planning

Key Design Insight
The modular architecture allowed information from multiple modules to populate single user screens, creating intuitive workflows that matched BRS's actual operational reality—not a generic flow.

Day One: The Critical Moment

The Setup
Launch day. 1,700 employees. Billions in equipment. Multiple software systems going live simultaneously (Level 2, Level 3, Level 4).

To manage the chaos, Shift's team set up a "war room" in the BRS cafeteria. Real purchase orders were processed live. Developers were present to make on-the-fly fixes. Every single IOM transaction worked.

 

Création sans titre (36)-1

"Ironically, of the four software platforms, IOM was the only one that worked flawlessly from Day One. The others all had issues. IOM has been running since the moment we turned it on."

Marc Orvis -  Director of Quality Assurance and Technical Service, Big River Steel

Operations & Sales Impact

Order Acknowledgment Time

  • Before: 2 weeks (industry standard) — customers waiting for confirmation
  • After: <1 day (often <1 hour) — competitive advantage in lead-time responsiveness
  • Improvement: 96% faster
  • Business Impact: Faster customer response = higher win rates + more customer satisfaction + competitive positioning

Production Planning Speed

  • Improvement: Up to 30% faster scheduling
  • Benefit: Better utilization of expensive mill equipment | Less downtime | Higher throughput

Order Accuracy

  • Reduction: Up to 40% fewer order errors
  • Benefit: Fewer production rework cycles | Less material waste | Higher margins on every coil

Operations and sales impact-1

 

Quality & Compliance Impact

Audit Preparation Time
  • Before: 3–4 weeks of data gathering for IATF/VDA audits
  • After: <1 week (data centralized in IOM)
  • Improvement: 50% reduction in audit burden

Why?
Purchase orders, invoices, credit/debit memos, shipping documentation, MTRs, certifications—all in IOM. Auditors have 100% visibility without silo-hopping.

Certification Maintenance
  • IATF Compliance: North American automotive supply requirement — maintained effortlessly
  • VDA Compliance: European automotive requirement — supported
  • Regulatory Risk: Near-zero exposure

Quality and compliance impact-1

 

IT & Finance Impact

Cost Avoidance:
  • Avoided: $50M–$100M+ typical ERP implementation
  • Actual IOM investment: "Very competitively priced" (Mark Orvis)
  • Savings: $30M–$80M in capital avoided

Operational Control:
  • Source code ownership: BRS's IT team can modify IOM independently
  • Zero vendor lock-in: Future flexibility assured
  • Strategic advantage: System evolves with business, not constrained by vendor roadmap

IT and finance impact-1

 

Employee & Organizational Impact

Training & Adoption
  • Training time: 60% faster than typical ERPs
  • Operational readiness: Most new hires productive within 2 weeks
  • User feedback: "Learning IOM is probably the easiest part of the job for new employees"

Experience Improvement
  • Reduced frustration: Single source of truth reduces coordination burden
  • Job satisfaction: Employees aren't fighting system limitations
  • Retention: Low turnover among power users

Employee and organizational impact-1

 

Evolution & Future Roadmap

Current State (2014–Present)
  • Big River Steel scaled from 1.5M to 3.5M tons annually—IOM scaled seamlessly
  • Zero redesign required | Zero downtime | Full audit trail maintained
  • Internal BRS IT team now makes optimizations independently
  • Relationship with Shift remains active and collaborative
Future Vision (Mark Orvis)
  • AI-assisted purchase order reading (similar to receipt scanning apps)
  • Potential to reduce order entry team from 15 people to 4–5
  • Elimination of data entry errors ("typo 1.0 vs. 0.1")

Evolution and future roadmap

 

Key Takeaway from BRS

IOM didn't just work on Day One. It became the operational backbone that enabled a $3B investment to generate ROI immediately. Flexibility, speed, and partnership made the difference.

Columbus Mississippi | North Star BlueScope Steel

Multiple Operators, Multiple Solutions: How Diverse Mills Found Success with IOM

Not every implementation mirrors Big River Steel. Some clients prioritized different outcomes:

Client Profile Composite
  • Columbus, Mississippi: Mid-size specialty mill | Focus: inventory optimization
  • North Star BlueScope Steel (Delta, Ohio): Large Midwest operation | Focus: supply chain speed

Columbus, Mississippi: Inventory Optimization

Challenge
Carrying inventory is expensive. Predicting demand accurately was difficult across multiple product lines.

IOM Solution
Real-time inventory tracking + usage analytics module → demand forecasting insights

Quantified Benefit
  • Inventory carrying costs reduced by 18-25%
  • Stock-out frequency decreased from 6 to 1-2 per month

North Star BlueScope Steel: Sales Cycle Acceleration

Challenge
Competitive market demanded faster quotes and order turnaround. Sales cycle delays lost deals.

IOM Solution
Order entry acceleration + automated quote generation → faster response to RFQs

Quantified Benefit
  • Quote turnaround: 5-7 days → 1-2 days
  • Win rate improvement: 8-15% increase in closed deals

Collective Insights

Collective Insights

Across all three operators, IOM delivered:
  • Operational flexibility: Each mill customized IOM to its priorities
  • Measurable ROI: Cost reductions, speed gains, risk mitigation quantified
  • Scalable partnerships: Shift adapted to each client's culture and pace

Common Success Patterns Across All Clients

1
Steel-Native expertise accelerated every project.
Vendors unfamiliar with mill operations cause delays. IOM's team understood coil tracking, grade families, and IATF requirements from Day One.
2
Partnership model matters.
Clients valued Shift's accessibility, responsiveness, and willingness to co-design solutions. "Married to these people" (typical client sentiment).
3
Flexibility drives ROI.
Each mill customized IOM differently. The system adapted to their process, not vice versa.
4
Day-One success sets the tone.
Every IOM client went live successfully and operated productively from launch. This contrasts sharply with industry norms for ERP projects.

What Our Customers Want You to Know Before You Start

Define Your Process Clearly (Before Development Starts)

Guidance
Spend time upfront defining *exactly* how you want to run your business—order workflows, approval sequences, quality checkpoints, financial controls. Don't assume the software will figure it out.

Big River Steel's Experience
"We weren't super clear on process at the start. Shift helped us define it. That clarity prevented major rework later."

Implication
IOM's Phase 1 (Discovery & Audit) is not a cost—it's an insurance policy against costly mid-project pivots.

Define your process

 

Choose a Partner You Trust (You'll Be Married for Years)

Guidance  
This isn't a transactional software purchase. This is a multi-year partnership. Choose a vendor you're comfortable with, that communicates clearly, and that responds when you need them—even on Saturday afternoon.

Big River Steel's Criterion 
"Can they respond when we have a production emergency? Are they available? Do we have direct access to senior people?"

Implication
Evaluate vendors not just on features, but on partnership quality, accessibility, and responsiveness.

Choose a partner you trust-1

 

Process First, Software Second (Never Reverse It)

Guidance
Your software should enable *your* operational logic, not force you into *its* logic. Define how you want to run your business. Then build/configure software that supports that.

Mark Orvis's Core Philosophy
"Software can't dictate how you run your business. It should be the other way around. You decide how you want to manage your enterprise. Then you build the software to support that process."

Implication
Avoid ERPs that force process adaptation. Choose flexibility.

Process first, software second

 

Want to understand the system deeper?

How does this compare to what SAP/Oracle promised?